Part B Party
In my experience as the English Language Learning specialist, I’ve supported mostly First Nations students who speak English as their first language but use a nonstandard dialect. This is considered a deficit and the Ministry of Education provides extra funding for these students as if they were speakers of foreign languages. Why? Well, to be quite honest: because it’s the government that made them like that.
The nonstandard “Rez English” is a direct result of the
genocide of the First Nations peoples, especially those who experienced the
Residential School system. These schools were meant to eradicate the native
indigenous languages, but they did not succeed in replacing that language with English.
The survivors of Residential Schools now no longer speak their native language
fluently, nor English. There was no philosophy of second language acquisition
at Residential Schools: you use English or you don’t communicate at all. English
became the language of trauma, and yet it was the only linguistic tool these
children could use. Upon return to their homes (if they were so lucky), the
survivors then passed down their broken English through the generations. But language
doesn’t stay broken for long. Humans have an immense capacity for grammar,
syntax, and vocabulary.
In linguistics study, a pidgin arises when speakers
of non-mutually-intelligible languages try to communicate. This may have
happened in the Residential schools on the part of the children. A creole
is a pidgin that has native speakers. A creole occurs when the pidgin has
developed into its own fully formed language. IF the Residential School
administrators cared at all about sharing the linguistic burden of
communication, the resulting creoles might have been more of a mix of both
languages. Instead, the creole in this situation came almost entirely from
English. Perhaps some of the first language is still evident—a comparative
linguist might be able to draw some conclusions about the lost native tongues
from relics persistent in extant non-standard English.
This is all information from my own professional development
research on the subject, though, and not where I’m taking my LIBE 477 project.
Suffice to say, there are native speakers of a nonstandard
dialect of English in our country who need explicit language instruction to find
success in academics. Compare this Rez Dialect to African-American English (AAVE,
now that the V has ben dropped). Both were created under systems of oppression,
and both are fully-formed languages unto their own, and both are considered
lower-class because of the sociolinguistic biases in our culture. Other nonstandard
dialects like Scots English, Newfie English, New Zealand English, and Irish English—to
name only a few—are comparable dialects with their own grammars, syntax, and
vocabularies. Yet these are not as universally reviled as Rez or African-American
English.
The internet has “flattened” our globe in a lot of ways,
made art and academics more democratic and accessible, and has also had an
effect on our language. Internet English is becoming its own dialect. With the
advent of web 2.0, English is becoming even more diverse than ever.
What are the effects of the internet on language? What are the
implications for English as a global language? What are the implications for standardization
of English communication? What are the implications of the variety of communicative
styles (emoji, ALL CAPS YELLING, nonstandard punctuation use, etc.) on academic
language arts standards? What are the advantages to being multidialectal in the
internet age? How do we teach code-switching skills explicitly?
I’ve found a place to start:
Jacob Eisenstein, the lead author and an assistant professor in Georgia Tech’s School of Interactive Computing, explained that “Non-standard English is not a question of ability, but of reserving standard English for the right social situations. In this sense, heavy social media users have an especially nuanced understanding of language, since they maintain multiple linguistic systems.”
-
7 Ways the
Internet is Improving Language, Gretchen McCulloch for Mental Floss
I’ve got this lovely little listicle, and a bunch of other
articles by Gretchen McCullouch. I’ve skimmed 5 or 6 academic papers discussing
the effect of the internet on language and academic standards. I’ve got a line
on a couple books to flip through. I know I still need to narrow down to a
single thesis, but I feel like I have some research to guide me now, and a lens through which to see.
This was a fascinating post that I learned much from. I appreciate the background, history and linguistic understanding that has informed your inquiry and guided your research. A good overview of the challenges faced when supporting ELL students and students struggling with language instruction, especially from a trauma informed lens. A few good resources to futher explore, and some good reflection on your own learning, exploration and understanding of this topic. I hope the inquiry contines to be valuable and your results informative.
ReplyDelete